Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 105435" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>I really hope you get this sorted out.&nbsp; It seems to be a big headache just to take pictures though.&nbsp; I would not have the patience to do what you are doing.&nbsp; In my mind, if i have read the manual front to back and have set up the camera the right way, it should take pictures that are in focus.&nbsp; If it does not, there is an obvious problem with the camera.&nbsp; People should not have to go through this to take pictures with today's DSLRs, pro bodies or otherwise.&nbsp; We should not have to become camera &quot;testers&quot; and use all these fangled methods of testing focus.&nbsp; It's ridiculous.&nbsp; It's like if bought a new car and i had to fine tune the steering for toe-in or toe-out.&nbsp; Excuse me, but [car manufacturer] made the damn car, you fix it!&nbsp; Don't expect me to become an overnight mechanic!&nbsp; Anyhow, more power to you guys who go through this. Though, this really is an item for the ridiculist.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="AC016, post: 105435, member: 9619"] I really hope you get this sorted out. It seems to be a big headache just to take pictures though. I would not have the patience to do what you are doing. In my mind, if i have read the manual front to back and have set up the camera the right way, it should take pictures that are in focus. If it does not, there is an obvious problem with the camera. People should not have to go through this to take pictures with today's DSLRs, pro bodies or otherwise. We should not have to become camera "testers" and use all these fangled methods of testing focus. It's ridiculous. It's like if bought a new car and i had to fine tune the steering for toe-in or toe-out. Excuse me, but [car manufacturer] made the damn car, you fix it! Don't expect me to become an overnight mechanic! Anyhow, more power to you guys who go through this. Though, this really is an item for the ridiculist. [/QUOTE]

Verification