Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
D750 1 Point Below D610 In DXoMark Scoring
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 372444" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I'm not going to argue the other two, but on this one it <em>really</em> has more to do with efficiency than mere habits. One of the reasons I jumped on a D750 that I really don't "need" (I have a NIB D610 and a D800 on the shelf) is that it has features that make my life as a photographer easier when I'm shooting. One-button 100% zoom, for instance. Can I click the + button 5-6 times? Yes. But to do that on 10 shots with fading light to see if I can move on means I eventually lose the light <em>that</em> much faster. The Canon wheel in experienced hands lets you review images 3-5X faster than Nikon's method, and when you're deleting crap or marking keepers from the last play while a team is in the huddle that makes a <em>huge</em> difference. It can only be a habit if you have it to experience first, and unless you're offering an alternative then it's not a habit, it's a differentiator.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this is the lunacy of judging a camera with simple sensor numbers. (<em>me thinks me smells an inebriated and out of money troll</em>)</p><p></p><p>I want to go into a rant about just how utterly ridiculous this point is, but I believe that's the OP's desire. So, I'll speak in terms someone living under a bridge might understand. A Ferrari and a Ford F-150 Super Cab both get 12MPG. Must be the same damn engine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 372444, member: 9240"] I'm not going to argue the other two, but on this one it [I]really[/I] has more to do with efficiency than mere habits. One of the reasons I jumped on a D750 that I really don't "need" (I have a NIB D610 and a D800 on the shelf) is that it has features that make my life as a photographer easier when I'm shooting. One-button 100% zoom, for instance. Can I click the + button 5-6 times? Yes. But to do that on 10 shots with fading light to see if I can move on means I eventually lose the light [I]that[/I] much faster. The Canon wheel in experienced hands lets you review images 3-5X faster than Nikon's method, and when you're deleting crap or marking keepers from the last play while a team is in the huddle that makes a [I]huge[/I] difference. It can only be a habit if you have it to experience first, and unless you're offering an alternative then it's not a habit, it's a differentiator. And this is the lunacy of judging a camera with simple sensor numbers. ([I]me thinks me smells an inebriated and out of money troll[/I]) I want to go into a rant about just how utterly ridiculous this point is, but I believe that's the OP's desire. So, I'll speak in terms someone living under a bridge might understand. A Ferrari and a Ford F-150 Super Cab both get 12MPG. Must be the same damn engine. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
D750 1 Point Below D610 In DXoMark Scoring
Top