Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 v D500 : Is it twice the camera?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 545519" data-attributes="member: 25095"><p>The D500 is supposed to have the low light performance that was previously only available in full frame bodies. That claim has caught my attention a time or two, but I'm still thinking that full frame is the direction I need to go in next.</p><p></p><p>You've already got a couple FF bodies, so I say that only from the perspective of the D7200 ... it *should* be better performing than the D7100, but it hasn't/wasn't claimed to be a pro-grade D5 with a crop sensor. Now, looking at the numbers like you have, I agree with the debate on whether it's twice the camera that the D7200 is. Personally, I think (hope?) it is, but don't know that there's been enough unbiased hands on tests to say at this point.</p><p></p><p>Seems like the D500 would make a nice companion to your D800, but the D7200 would line up better with the D750 ... at least as far as the location of the controls on the camera body. I've also been looking at going FF after the D7100 because of low light performance, but I just don't see the D7200 as being that big of an upgrade considering my other options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 545519, member: 25095"] The D500 is supposed to have the low light performance that was previously only available in full frame bodies. That claim has caught my attention a time or two, but I'm still thinking that full frame is the direction I need to go in next. You've already got a couple FF bodies, so I say that only from the perspective of the D7200 ... it *should* be better performing than the D7100, but it hasn't/wasn't claimed to be a pro-grade D5 with a crop sensor. Now, looking at the numbers like you have, I agree with the debate on whether it's twice the camera that the D7200 is. Personally, I think (hope?) it is, but don't know that there's been enough unbiased hands on tests to say at this point. Seems like the D500 would make a nice companion to your D800, but the D7200 would line up better with the D750 ... at least as far as the location of the controls on the camera body. I've also been looking at going FF after the D7100 because of low light performance, but I just don't see the D7200 as being that big of an upgrade considering my other options. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 v D500 : Is it twice the camera?
Top