Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 450786" data-attributes="member: 24569">If you are referring to the wildlife shots which point out the advantage of the greater reach with the same focal length lens by the DX sensor vs an FX sensor,&nbsp; it is a very scientific approach since it compares the images at the SIZE THEY WILL BE VIEWED. Too many people simply look at 100% crops without regard to the real life size that the picture will be viewed in. Full frame pictures have to be cropped significantly to be the same angle of view as a DX sensor. The review takes this into consideration when making comparisons. Clearly, when you can control camera to subject distance, the FX cameras will still have advantages. I can't get that crazy Kingfisher to come any closer and pose for me, though. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 450786, member: 24569"] If you are referring to the wildlife shots which point out the advantage of the greater reach with the same focal length lens by the DX sensor vs an FX sensor, it is a [B]very[/B] scientific approach since it compares the images at the SIZE THEY WILL BE VIEWED. Too many people simply look at 100% crops without regard to the real life size that the picture will be viewed in. Full frame pictures have to be cropped significantly to be the same angle of view as a DX sensor. The review takes this into consideration when making comparisons. Clearly, when you can control camera to subject distance, the FX cameras will still have advantages. I can't get that crazy Kingfisher to come any closer and pose for me, though. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification