Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 441163" data-attributes="member: 9240">When I made my case in 2011 there was nothing like the current Canon offering, so choosing the D7000 was easy, and something even my Canon shooting brother understood.&nbsp; Today?&nbsp; The only thing that would scare me off is the $500 extra on the price tag.&nbsp; All things being equal there's a chance I'd still go Nikon with the D7200 were I a novice entering the market today, but I would have likely got a sterner lecture from my brother.I just don't understand how Nikon can go 4 years tossing a middle finger at the pro-DX market?!&nbsp; They seem lost trying to find a way to compete with all the varied camera types while not cannibalizing their own camera market.&nbsp; But damn, if they hurt a few pro wildlife photographers' D4s sales with a camera that sells in the high thousands instead of the high hundreds then isn't that really a &quot;win&quot;?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 441163, member: 9240"] When I made my case in 2011 there was nothing like the current Canon offering, so choosing the D7000 was easy, and something even my Canon shooting brother understood. Today? The only thing that would scare me off is the $500 extra on the price tag. All things being equal there's a chance I'd still go Nikon with the D7200 were I a novice entering the market today, but I would have likely got a sterner lecture from my brother. I just don't understand how Nikon can go 4 years tossing a middle finger at the pro-DX market?! They seem lost trying to find a way to compete with all the varied camera types while not cannibalizing their own camera market. But damn, if they hurt a few pro wildlife photographers' D4s sales with a camera that sells in the high thousands instead of the high hundreds then isn't that really a "win"? [/QUOTE]

Verification