Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 as a Wildlife camera? Not so much
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 441119" data-attributes="member: 24569"><p>Not sure where you are getting your stats. The D7200 has MUCH better dynamic range, color depth and low light performance than the Canon. Check this link:</p><p></p><p>[video]http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Nikon-D7200-The-new-APS-C-champ/Comparison-2-Nikon-D7200-vs-Canon-7D-Mark-II-vs-Sony-A77-II[/video]</p><p></p><p>The only advantage I see of the 7D MK II is the 10 fps vs. 6 fps. If that's the main spec that is important to a photographer, then the Canon wins out. </p><p></p><p>As for the original article link, I agree that the full frame cameras mentioned, which cost 2 to 6 times as much as the D7200, have better low light performance. That's kind of an "uh-duh" to me. Otherwise, I don't really see the point of the article.</p><p></p><p>I'm NOT saying that I don't wish Nikon would come out with a 10 fps DX "pro" level camera. I AM saying I'd rather have the D7200 than the 7D MkII at this point, for the better image quality. That's just me, of course. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 441119, member: 24569"] Not sure where you are getting your stats. The D7200 has MUCH better dynamic range, color depth and low light performance than the Canon. Check this link: [video]http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Nikon-D7200-The-new-APS-C-champ/Comparison-2-Nikon-D7200-vs-Canon-7D-Mark-II-vs-Sony-A77-II[/video] The only advantage I see of the 7D MK II is the 10 fps vs. 6 fps. If that's the main spec that is important to a photographer, then the Canon wins out. As for the original article link, I agree that the full frame cameras mentioned, which cost 2 to 6 times as much as the D7200, have better low light performance. That's kind of an "uh-duh" to me. Otherwise, I don't really see the point of the article. I'm NOT saying that I don't wish Nikon would come out with a 10 fps DX "pro" level camera. I AM saying I'd rather have the D7200 than the 7D MkII at this point, for the better image quality. That's just me, of course. :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
D7200 as a Wildlife camera? Not so much
Top