Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 716241" data-attributes="member: 12827">I guess by DSLR standards, a 2013 camera body is getting &quot;long in the tooth&quot; but here is the proof that it is not necessarily the case. I was at Huntington State Park today and as I was leaving, an Osprey with a small fish landed in a tree right in front of me. With the DX crop, my 600mm f/4 ED IF AIS became a 900mm f/4 and although the Osprey was a pretty good ways off I decided to go ahead and give it a shot. Just as the 600mm f/4 AIS never disappoints, neither does the D7100. Below is a comparison of the full frame, no crop image with a box delineating the crop, as well as the cropped image. 

[ATTACH]324197[/ATTACH]And here is a larger image of the final crop:[ATTACH]324198[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="STM, post: 716241, member: 12827"] [LEFT][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Verdana]I guess by DSLR standards, a 2013 camera body is getting "long in the tooth" but here is the proof that it is not necessarily the case. I was at Huntington State Park today and as I was leaving, an Osprey with a small fish landed in a tree right in front of me. With the DX crop, my 600mm f/4 ED IF AIS became a 900mm f/4 and although the Osprey was a pretty good ways off I decided to go ahead and give it a shot. Just as the 600mm f/4 AIS never disappoints, neither does the D7100. Below is a comparison of the full frame, no crop image with a box delineating the crop, as well as the cropped image. [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT] [ATTACH=CONFIG]324197._xfImport[/ATTACH] And here is a larger image of the final crop: [ATTACH=CONFIG]324198._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification