Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
D7100 - D750 conundrum?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mauckcg" data-source="post: 506657" data-attributes="member: 13944"><p>No. In my experience with the D7100 has shown me the sensor needs a very good quality optic to get the best out of it. The only prime I have owned to date is the 35 1.8 dx lens. Stellar lens on the D5200, but not quite as sharp on the D7100. </p><p></p><p>I've been able to get 30x40 prints from the 70-200 on the D7100. I have yet to get that same level of quality from the 200-400 VR1. </p><p></p><p>Right now i'm pretty sure the issue is me. Thanks to work I haven't been able to get spend enough time with the lens at a track to figure this beast out. </p><p></p><p>My preference is towards zooms, less to buy to get the same range and less to lug around a race track or airshow. If the 200-400 works out, great, if not, then there are plenty of other options, including the primes you mentioned. And knowing myself, if I were to rent a 300 2.8 and it lives up to it's reputation, I'd have a reeeeaaaaalllllly hard time not buying a version of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mauckcg, post: 506657, member: 13944"] No. In my experience with the D7100 has shown me the sensor needs a very good quality optic to get the best out of it. The only prime I have owned to date is the 35 1.8 dx lens. Stellar lens on the D5200, but not quite as sharp on the D7100. I've been able to get 30x40 prints from the 70-200 on the D7100. I have yet to get that same level of quality from the 200-400 VR1. Right now i'm pretty sure the issue is me. Thanks to work I haven't been able to get spend enough time with the lens at a track to figure this beast out. My preference is towards zooms, less to buy to get the same range and less to lug around a race track or airshow. If the 200-400 works out, great, if not, then there are plenty of other options, including the primes you mentioned. And knowing myself, if I were to rent a 300 2.8 and it lives up to it's reputation, I'd have a reeeeaaaaalllllly hard time not buying a version of it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
D7100 - D750 conundrum?
Top