Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Johnathan Aulabaugh" data-source="post: 119304" data-attributes="member: 7698">I have both as well. Edited above post with link My reference to it this far out was in scarcasm like I said about it is Obvious at this point that the D7000 was in fact the D90 replacement... I honestly do not see a D400 in the works but we will see considering the huge oversight on the D7100I had almost bought the D600 a few months ago but can not seem to get past the &quot;Idea&quot; of the 1.5 crop... ultimately I would like to have a FF for portraits and a DX for my wildlife but there is the mental block I seem to be having since I do not like to crop in post processing beyond a slight straighten. Physically with a 24 or 36 MP camera I can crop down with little or no problems for printing or clarity. So it comes down to speed and buffer I suppose now. Like many like me I prefer to fill the frame in camera so if I make the jump I will also need some bigger glass.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Johnathan Aulabaugh, post: 119304, member: 7698"] I have both as well. Edited above post with link My reference to it this far out was in scarcasm like I said about it is Obvious at this point that the D7000 was in fact the D90 replacement... I honestly do not see a D400 in the works but we will see considering the huge oversight on the D7100 I had almost bought the D600 a few months ago but can not seem to get past the "Idea" of the 1.5 crop... ultimately I would like to have a FF for portraits and a DX for my wildlife but there is the mental block I seem to be having since I do not like to crop in post processing beyond a slight straighten. Physically with a 24 or 36 MP camera I can crop down with little or no problems for printing or clarity. So it comes down to speed and buffer I suppose now. Like many like me I prefer to fill the frame in camera so if I make the jump I will also need some bigger glass. [/QUOTE]

Verification