Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dwhopson" data-source="post: 270990" data-attributes="member: 21816"><p>Hi Everyone...&nbsp; I'm about to purchase a new D7000 (coming from Pentax - please keep your comments to yourself!). I would like to purchase a 35/1.8 and/or 50/1.8.&nbsp; I know there are three different ones...no delineation, D variant and G variant (to simplify).&nbsp; When used on the D7000 is there a lot of difference in image quality/resolving power between the three variants.&nbsp; The biggest reason for the question is that I have read on other forums that the D variant doesn't provide enough resolving power for the D7000/7100...Can anyone verify this?&nbsp; If this is true, I'd also assume the non-delineated versions of these lenses also wouldn't provide appropriate resolution to the sensor.&nbsp; I don't want to spend $$ on lenses to end up with sub-par results on a top-flight body.&nbsp; &nbsp; I know with my pentax the FA series 35/2 and 50/1.4 - these were truly must-haves with hefty price tags but also image quality to match (and are in regular use with the flagship 24mp K-3 without issue)...Can I expect the same here?&nbsp; Thanks for the help and advice to a soon to be newbie in Nikon-land! dwh</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="dwhopson, post: 270990, member: 21816"] Hi Everyone... I'm about to purchase a new D7000 (coming from Pentax - please keep your comments to yourself!). I would like to purchase a 35/1.8 and/or 50/1.8. I know there are three different ones...no delineation, D variant and G variant (to simplify). When used on the D7000 is there a lot of difference in image quality/resolving power between the three variants. The biggest reason for the question is that I have read on other forums that the D variant doesn't provide enough resolving power for the D7000/7100...Can anyone verify this? If this is true, I'd also assume the non-delineated versions of these lenses also wouldn't provide appropriate resolution to the sensor. I don't want to spend $$ on lenses to end up with sub-par results on a top-flight body. I know with my pentax the FA series 35/2 and 50/1.4 - these were truly must-haves with hefty price tags but also image quality to match (and are in regular use with the flagship 24mp K-3 without issue)...Can I expect the same here? Thanks for the help and advice to a soon to be newbie in Nikon-land! dwh [/QUOTE]

Verification