Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gladiator" data-source="post: 8857" data-attributes="member: 761">Well at least it wasn't me <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />  As for the 50mm i was thinking of getting a 50 mm f/1.4 AF-D soon  anyways for very low light situations, or just save for a lens i end up  needing a whole lot more being a 14-24mm f/2.8 or 20-35 f/2.8 since i  rarely shoot sports.  My medium-range plan was to get the wide-angle,  then the 70-200mm f/2.8 or the 80-200mm /2.8 (a lot cheaper) and then  the 24-70mm f/2.8 and then i would be in business, poor but in business  ;-)  Not counting a good macro and PC-E lens argh</blockquote>