Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark F" data-source="post: 329985" data-attributes="member: 12825"><p>One last response. Yes, fx is more capable than dx camera bodies. But what you and most people forget is the lens in front of that body.</p><p>A mediocre fx lens on a dx body is going to produce a little better image that that mediocre lens on the fx body. I can say that from firsthand experience. I can only afford mediocre fx lenses. Put a pro quality fx lens on an fx body... Nothing better than that... But 2000.00+ lens isn't in my budget. People on this forum have steered me to a couple other lenses for the d610. I'm going to check them out. As it stands, the lenses I was using ( which is what I could afford... I'd have to sell things to get any more lenses ) wasn't producing the images I wanted. Those lenses on a dx body did. Hence my inquiry here. I will keep the d610 and hopefully be in a position later on to get a decent lens for it. But the d3300 with the 18-55 and the fx lens 24-85 are awesome on that camera body. </p><p>When I shoot and can look at the picture and say, oh wow, instead of, well hopefully I can fix it in photoshop...that's all the documented proof I need. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark F, post: 329985, member: 12825"] One last response. Yes, fx is more capable than dx camera bodies. But what you and most people forget is the lens in front of that body. A mediocre fx lens on a dx body is going to produce a little better image that that mediocre lens on the fx body. I can say that from firsthand experience. I can only afford mediocre fx lenses. Put a pro quality fx lens on an fx body... Nothing better than that... But 2000.00+ lens isn't in my budget. People on this forum have steered me to a couple other lenses for the d610. I'm going to check them out. As it stands, the lenses I was using ( which is what I could afford... I'd have to sell things to get any more lenses ) wasn't producing the images I wanted. Those lenses on a dx body did. Hence my inquiry here. I will keep the d610 and hopefully be in a position later on to get a decent lens for it. But the d3300 with the 18-55 and the fx lens 24-85 are awesome on that camera body. When I shoot and can look at the picture and say, oh wow, instead of, well hopefully I can fix it in photoshop...that's all the documented proof I need. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
Top