Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 329797" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>Yes, that was my original response. f/8 is f/8, 1/100 second is 1/100 second, and ISO 100 is ISO 100. DX or FX sensor does not affect those parameters.</p><p></p><p>The general answer might also include "nor camera shake on a tripod", but the DX image is in fact smaller, and has to be enlarged more, which would slightly magnify the blur, if any.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, because FX is a larger sensor, which if assuming similar megapixel counts, then generally implying more space for larger pixel buckets to collect photons, which is a higher signal to noise ratio, which is less noise.</p><p></p><p>But it depends on how many actual pixels are present in the area of that sensor, and so what is the actual size of the pixels? You could make a DX sensor with fewer but larger pixels than FX. I doubt it is done that way in our cameras (in the same technology era), but large pixels are extremely important to telescope astronomers (for low noise). Generally they cool their CCD sensors in use, to reduce noise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 329797, member: 12496"] Yes, that was my original response. f/8 is f/8, 1/100 second is 1/100 second, and ISO 100 is ISO 100. DX or FX sensor does not affect those parameters. The general answer might also include "nor camera shake on a tripod", but the DX image is in fact smaller, and has to be enlarged more, which would slightly magnify the blur, if any. Yes, because FX is a larger sensor, which if assuming similar megapixel counts, then generally implying more space for larger pixel buckets to collect photons, which is a higher signal to noise ratio, which is less noise. But it depends on how many actual pixels are present in the area of that sensor, and so what is the actual size of the pixels? You could make a DX sensor with fewer but larger pixels than FX. I doubt it is done that way in our cameras (in the same technology era), but large pixels are extremely important to telescope astronomers (for low noise). Generally they cool their CCD sensors in use, to reduce noise. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
Top