Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark F" data-source="post: 329166" data-attributes="member: 12825"><p><strong>610 vs 7100</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hence the reason for the question. Like I said, every thread I read about this subject always end up in quantum scientific physics that make no sense to anyone except PhDs in mathematics. </p><p>I shoot a shot... Post process it from raw and up the contrast and sharpness. Print it, frame it, hang it on a wall somewhere. Quality of how the image looks is my goal. All the rest is gooblygarbage to me. What I see is what I got.</p><p>So, I am keeping the 610 for now. I like the advantages of FX. I like the high ISO for night shots, I like what I see for indoor, architecture shots, and for candid people shots. I just don't see the difference in landscapes. </p><p>I am getting a d3300 and comparing. It will be a nice light weight kit. Bells and whistles aren't really necessary. I can control shutter speed, ISO, aperture, white balance. All else is convenient and nice to have for speed, but I'm in no hurry. If I like what I see, I'll think about getting the 7100 or 7200 which ever... And go from there. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark F, post: 329166, member: 12825"] [b]610 vs 7100[/b] Hence the reason for the question. Like I said, every thread I read about this subject always end up in quantum scientific physics that make no sense to anyone except PhDs in mathematics. I shoot a shot... Post process it from raw and up the contrast and sharpness. Print it, frame it, hang it on a wall somewhere. Quality of how the image looks is my goal. All the rest is gooblygarbage to me. What I see is what I got. So, I am keeping the 610 for now. I like the advantages of FX. I like the high ISO for night shots, I like what I see for indoor, architecture shots, and for candid people shots. I just don't see the difference in landscapes. I am getting a d3300 and comparing. It will be a nice light weight kit. Bells and whistles aren't really necessary. I can control shutter speed, ISO, aperture, white balance. All else is convenient and nice to have for speed, but I'm in no hurry. If I like what I see, I'll think about getting the 7100 or 7200 which ever... And go from there. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
Top