Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 329083" data-attributes="member: 9240">Re: 610 vs 7100What you missed, Wayne, is that I stated explicitly that I'm using lenses of equivalent focal length (i.e. 35mm on DX, 52mm on FX).&nbsp; We went through this argument ages ago and you won me over - equivalent focal length lenses used this way produces the same image.&nbsp; So, now all we're varying is light information due to pixel size.&nbsp; Yes, there's potential going to be things lost in the light details of the smaller pixel camera, but assuming equivalently sharp lenses and non-extreme lighting conditions the resulting images will be the nearly identical 24MP images, with the D600/610 image being 6014x4014px vs. the D7100 being 6000x4000px).&nbsp; Using the same lens, yes, you have all the rest of the stuff to consider - but that's not what I said, and I'm pretty darn sure that's not what Geoff meant when he made the statement.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 329083, member: 9240"] [b]Re: 610 vs 7100[/b] What you missed, Wayne, is that I stated explicitly that [I][B]I'm using lenses of equivalent focal length (i.e. 35mm on DX, 52mm on FX)[/B][/I]. We went through this argument ages ago and you won me over - equivalent focal length lenses used this way produces the same image. So, now all we're varying is light information due to pixel size. Yes, there's potential going to be things lost in the light details of the smaller pixel camera, but assuming equivalently sharp lenses and non-extreme lighting conditions the resulting images will be the nearly identical 24MP images, with the D600/610 image being 6014x4014px vs. the D7100 being 6000x4000px). Using the same lens, yes, you have all the rest of the stuff to consider - but that's not what I said, and I'm pretty darn sure that's not what Geoff meant when he made the statement. [/QUOTE]

Verification