Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 328988" data-attributes="member: 25095">Re: 610 vs 7100Mark, if it helps at all I'm going through a similar mental debate on what will replace my D5300 ... do I go full frame or stay DX and go to the 7100 (or 7200 if announced soon enough). In the end, mathematics aside, this reminds me of the oil and tire debates we had on the motorcycle forums where it all boils down to ... what makes you happy. If you can get the shots you want in the time needed with the 7100 and it costs you less, that may be your answer. I'm leaning towards FX because I tend to do more outside landscapes and am searching for wider and ultra-wide lenses, so the crop on the DX doesn't let me get as wide as I'd like. Part of what is fueling my debate is if/when a D620 will be released without the OLPF for a truer comparison to the 7100, but then I also think I'm getting hung up on waiting for the latest and greatest.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 328988, member: 25095"] [b]Re: 610 vs 7100[/b] Mark, if it helps at all I'm going through a similar mental debate on what will replace my D5300 ... do I go full frame or stay DX and go to the 7100 (or 7200 if announced soon enough). In the end, mathematics aside, this reminds me of the oil and tire debates we had on the motorcycle forums where it all boils down to ... what makes you happy. If you can get the shots you want in the time needed with the 7100 and it costs you less, that may be your answer. I'm leaning towards FX because I tend to do more outside landscapes and am searching for wider and ultra-wide lenses, so the crop on the DX doesn't let me get as wide as I'd like. Part of what is fueling my debate is if/when a D620 will be released without the OLPF for a truer comparison to the 7100, but then I also think I'm getting hung up on waiting for the latest and greatest. [/QUOTE]

Verification