Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark F" data-source="post: 328973" data-attributes="member: 12825"><p><strong>Re: 610 vs 7100</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I hear ya. Every time a subject comes up about this, it's the same responses. </p><p>Pixels and size... Splitting hairs... Technical mathematical reasons for one thing over the other. Answers that fail to appear is lack of aa filter on the d7100. More focus points and spread out over the sensor... Etc. what I have seen is the shots between these cameras ( without going into zooming over 100% ) with the same focal point, same field of view represented, the 7100 looks sharper. Post can compensate for that but still. </p><p>I'm not saying this dx camera is better that my d610. What I am saying is that with the dx lenses available, I could produce almost the same quality shots for less money spent. </p><p>At this point, if going back to dx, I would buy new. I've been offered 1900.00 for the d610 with kit lens which would let me buy a d7100 and two good dx lenses for landscape and medium zoom.</p><p>It always gets me just how technical these threads turn into. I don't really care about the mathematics of each sensor and each pixel. I care about how the photo looks after it gets printed and is hanging on a wall.</p><p>I printed 13x19 prints at 300dpi from my d300s without having to enlarge the file first in Photoshop. They came out fine. What I have noticed with the 24 mp sensors and cameras is better color and the ability to crop a little and still get printed quality. </p><p>The comparison of these two cameras should be final print to final print and what the naked eye can see instead of do xxx amount of money spent, you can get more xx from each pixel that you won't be able to see until you print billboard size and stand 6 feet away. </p><p>I will keep my d610, but I will probably buy a 7100 or 7200 later on.</p><p>I'm purchasing a d3300 now for a light carry all and will see what happens with that. I'll look into that 18-35 lens which will work on both cameras at the area I do most of my shooting.</p><p>Sorry for the long thread <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark F, post: 328973, member: 12825"] [b]Re: 610 vs 7100[/b] I hear ya. Every time a subject comes up about this, it's the same responses. Pixels and size... Splitting hairs... Technical mathematical reasons for one thing over the other. Answers that fail to appear is lack of aa filter on the d7100. More focus points and spread out over the sensor... Etc. what I have seen is the shots between these cameras ( without going into zooming over 100% ) with the same focal point, same field of view represented, the 7100 looks sharper. Post can compensate for that but still. I'm not saying this dx camera is better that my d610. What I am saying is that with the dx lenses available, I could produce almost the same quality shots for less money spent. At this point, if going back to dx, I would buy new. I've been offered 1900.00 for the d610 with kit lens which would let me buy a d7100 and two good dx lenses for landscape and medium zoom. It always gets me just how technical these threads turn into. I don't really care about the mathematics of each sensor and each pixel. I care about how the photo looks after it gets printed and is hanging on a wall. I printed 13x19 prints at 300dpi from my d300s without having to enlarge the file first in Photoshop. They came out fine. What I have noticed with the 24 mp sensors and cameras is better color and the ability to crop a little and still get printed quality. The comparison of these two cameras should be final print to final print and what the naked eye can see instead of do xxx amount of money spent, you can get more xx from each pixel that you won't be able to see until you print billboard size and stand 6 feet away. I will keep my d610, but I will probably buy a 7100 or 7200 later on. I'm purchasing a d3300 now for a light carry all and will see what happens with that. I'll look into that 18-35 lens which will work on both cameras at the area I do most of my shooting. Sorry for the long thread :). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
D610 vs D7100
Top
