Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 143177" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>I am thinking these days that FX may be the better choice for wildlife, just because of the IQ you get with the sensor.  When i shoot birds, i shoot them so that i can "virtually" get up close to them so i can see them in detail.  Forget about the whole "reach" thing.  With a 24mp FX sensor, you can crop the photo a bit and - i don't think - lose much IQ.  Even with my D5100, i can crop and not really lose any IQ.  At this point in time, if i was able to swap either of my cams for an FX cam, i would do it without hesitation.  Just my amateur opinion <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>