Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 343744" data-attributes="member: 9240">On the second body I bought I saw them at f/8 and smaller, particularly when I'd ratchet up clarity or structure, something I do a lot on the series of street shots I'm currently doing.  This check was purely to see what I had after a week of shooting with the camera back - something I was asked to do by the Nikon rep I spoke to when the camera made its 3rd trip back.  This is something I'd normally just clean and move on.  It looks far more like dirt than the shutter disintegrating, but if it gets me a body swap then so be it.  Truth is, I was reading <a href="http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/07/nikon-settles-d600-lawsuit-offers-replacement-d610-cameras/" target="_blank">this post on Phoblographer</a> and decided to call to ask about the paperwork I needed to fill out to get the D610 body since my second body was on its way in at the moment.  This resulted in a discussion about my previous body and shot were taken after that.  I got a call back last night, 2 hours after I was told I'd get one and was in the middle of cooking dinner, basically telling me to send in 2 dust images, but I'm going to call them today and discuss it.  The person I spoke with earlier started asking about whether my initial D600 was purchased with a lens, and I know that when hark had hers replaced they asked her to pay the difference between the current sell price on the D610 and the package price she purchased minus the retail value of the 24-85mm.  I'm going to have a bit of an issue if they do the same with me after 3 trips, particularly given that this is not what they're doing with others, or the lawsuit settlement, but we'll see.  More to come...@oldhippie, it's always hard to tell with cropped photos of the sensor.</blockquote>

Verification