Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 335894" data-attributes="member: 9240">Final post about this unless there's something horrible to report.&nbsp; In its previous two return trips to Nikon the D600's shutter count went up &lt;100 clicks each time.&nbsp; I forgot to document the first trip, but the second was only 75 as documented <a href="http://nikonites.com/d600-d610/13111-d600-back-home-again-interesting-repair-note.html#axzz38ThhfARy" target="_blank">in this thread</a>.&nbsp; This time I remembered to grab one jpg shot before it went into the box and one after taking it out.&nbsp; Here are the counts...[ATTACH]102979[/ATTACH]The first two trips were in Feb-March and April of 2013, long before Nikon admitted to any issue with the camera, so I suspect the service order was simply, &quot;Replace it, test it, and move on.&quot;&nbsp; I don't say that to short shrift the original work (which would have been perfectly acceptable for a typical shutter replacement), but to point out that whatever Nikon is doing with the current work it is apparently more methodical and far more completely tested - at least the evidence would point to that.&nbsp; Or it took them a hell of a long time to adjust my focus calibration. LOLOne interesting note is that the two photos used to generate these counts were numerically 1 apart, so it appears as if Nikon takes the time to return whatever image counter you're using back to the state it was in when the camera was shipped.&nbsp; IIRC, this was not the case with the other repairs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 335894, member: 9240"] Final post about this unless there's something horrible to report. In its previous two return trips to Nikon the D600's shutter count went up <100 clicks each time. I forgot to document the first trip, but the second was only 75 as documented [URL="http://nikonites.com/d600-d610/13111-d600-back-home-again-interesting-repair-note.html#axzz38ThhfARy"]in this thread[/URL]. This time I remembered to grab one jpg shot before it went into the box and one after taking it out. Here are the counts... [ATTACH=CONFIG]102979._xfImport[/ATTACH] The first two trips were in Feb-March and April of 2013, long before Nikon admitted to any [I]issue[/I] with the camera, so I suspect the service order was simply, "Replace it, test it, and move on." I don't say that to short shrift the original work (which would have been perfectly acceptable for a [I]typical shutter replacement[/I]), but to point out that whatever Nikon is doing with the current work it is apparently more methodical and far more completely tested - at least the evidence would point to that. Or it took them a hell of a long time to adjust my focus calibration. LOL One interesting note is that the two photos used to generate these counts were numerically 1 apart, so it appears as if Nikon takes the time to return whatever image counter you're using back to the state it was in when the camera was shipped. IIRC, this was [I]not[/I] the case with the other repairs. [/QUOTE]

Verification