Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 515203" data-attributes="member: 13556">If that is the case, yes it would.&nbsp; As it is, I wouldn't purchase a D600 for any amount that anyone sane would sell it for, even to have Nikon repair it under warranty.&nbsp; (If you want to test this, give me a try!&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />)I was under the impression that Nikon was offering repair service for this issue with the D600 whether you were the original owner or not.&nbsp; They seemed to be doing this to both head off a class-action lawsuit&nbsp; and to restore their reputation.&nbsp; IMO, the D600 dust issue caused great damage to Nikon's reputation, and they were doing everything that they could to resolve the issue and attempting to restore their reputation.WM</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 515203, member: 13556"] If that is the case, yes it would. As it is, I wouldn't purchase a D600 for any amount that anyone sane would sell it for, even to have Nikon repair it under warranty. (If you want to test this, give me a try! :)) I was under the impression that Nikon was offering repair service for this issue with the D600 whether you were the original owner or not. They seemed to be doing this to both head off a class-action lawsuit and to restore their reputation. IMO, the D600 dust issue caused great damage to Nikon's reputation, and they were doing everything that they could to resolve the issue and attempting to restore their reputation. WM [/QUOTE]

Verification