Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 286546" data-attributes="member: 13196">Mike, the D600 is a terrific camera but one that is a gamble. If you are considering buying one since Nikon is now fixing or replacing it, please know that most likely you wouldn't walk away with a D610 as a replacement if you run into repair problems (unless you pay the difference in price). Although Nikon says it will replace a D600 with a new camera, it doesn't specify how that works. Since I received a refund for my D600, please know that I had to submit my receipt, and they reimbursed me for its cost. I bought mine through B&H, and the way the receipt was written (it came with freebies), I only received $1889 for the camera...not $1999 that I was billed. The freebies were itemized with dollar amounts listed. The receipt was written that way BECAUSE I returned the first D600 within the initial 30-day period. B&H stepped up and credited me the difference which I applied towards the replacement cost of my D610 so I was fortunate to recover the extra $100+ that I would have lost.My point in telling you this is that I *think* Nikon will only replace a D600 with a camera that costs what the owner paid out of pocket. If you buy a used/refurbished D600, the only new replacement camera for that price would be a DX body. Most likely a D600 owner would have to pay the full difference in price if a D610 (or more expensive body) is desired if they bought a D600 used/refurbished.</blockquote>

Verification