Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 82327" data-attributes="member: 4399">Thanks Joe. This was a huge step for me and I'm sure I'll be with this for a very long time. I kept second guessing my Dx position as I sunk more money into lenses. I now have more of a sense that each lens I buy will be a permanent investment. It was also nice to end the mental haggling I was going through (I'm sure many have gone through this <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />). The more I reseached the pixel density issue, the more I realized Fx was better for my style, generally shooting between f8-f13 for landscapes/waterfalls, ect. With the mega-pixel race, I'm convinced the next top Dx will be greater than 16mp and Sensor diffraction will become a problem for unsuspecting enthusists/pros buying a high end Dx.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 82327, member: 4399"] Thanks Joe. This was a huge step for me and I'm sure I'll be with this for a very long time. I kept second guessing my Dx position as I sunk more money into lenses. I now have more of a sense that each lens I buy will be a permanent investment. It was also nice to end the mental haggling I was going through (I'm sure many have gone through this :)). The more I reseached the pixel density issue, the more I realized Fx was better for my style, generally shooting between f8-f13 for landscapes/waterfalls, ect. With the mega-pixel race, I'm convinced the next top Dx will be greater than 16mp and Sensor diffraction will become a problem for unsuspecting enthusists/pros buying a high end Dx. [/QUOTE]

Verification