Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brian" data-source="post: 220465" data-attributes="member: 17621">Other products had problems in first year of production, and this is not the first product from Nikon that had problems.The last one that I can remember that was this bad was the Nikkorex 35. Legend has it that Nikon took the unsold units and dumped them at sea. They replaced it with the Nikkorex 35-2, which was not much better. Then they quit making fixed-lens SLR's with leaf shutters altogether. So you have to go back 50 years to find a Nikon camera that was as bad as the D600.The problem that I see- once a camera had been returned for the second time with the same problem, supposedly repaired: the camera should have been replaced. Requiring it to be returned three times and more is ridiculous. The camera has a high incidence of recurring problems, which points to a design fault. The introduction of the D610 and termination of the D600 emphasizes that point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brian, post: 220465, member: 17621"] Other products had problems in first year of production, and this is not the first product from Nikon that had problems. The last one that I can remember that was this bad was the Nikkorex 35. Legend has it that Nikon took the unsold units and dumped them at sea. They replaced it with the Nikkorex 35-2, which was not much better. Then they quit making fixed-lens SLR's with leaf shutters altogether. So you have to go back 50 years to find a Nikon camera that was as bad as the D600. The problem that I see- once a camera had been returned for the second time with the same problem, supposedly repaired: the camera should have been replaced. Requiring it to be returned three times and more is ridiculous. The camera has a high incidence of recurring problems, which points to a design fault. The introduction of the D610 and termination of the D600 emphasizes that point. [/QUOTE]

Verification