Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 738265" data-attributes="member: 18251">@NeedaJust to add a bit of explanation to that made by Woodyg3.Dear Needa, suppose you're watching two photos, displayed side by side (or one above the other) on a 27'' HD (1080p) monitor. One of the photos is made by D500, the other is made by, say, D610. Both photos are displayed in the &quot;windowed mode&quot; (say, they seemingly have the &quot;dimension&quot; of a postcard). Both cameras used zoom lenses, the photographer took a great care to capture the same area of the particular object (let's suppose it's a portrait) with the same or almost the same settings (ISO value, shutter speed, jpg straight out of camera etc.). Of course, the photographer had to keep in mind the difference between ff and a cropped frame, etc. etc. Now, the point is this: you will not see much (if any) difference in &quot;basic technical quality&quot; (so to speak). However,&nbsp; the pixels will start &quot;rearing their ugly heads&quot; once you enlarge these photos to the certain size(s), but it will be even more obvious once the both are printed using the same printer, same paper/textile. Suffice to say, full frame will have the upper hand.I hope I was clear enough (obviously, English is not my native language... but I adore English<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" />).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 738265, member: 18251"] @[B]Needa [/B]Just to add a bit of explanation to that made by Woodyg3. Dear Needa, suppose you're watching two photos, displayed side by side (or one above the other) on a 27'' HD (1080p) monitor. One of the photos is made by D500, the other is made by, say, D610. Both photos are displayed in the "windowed mode" (say, they seemingly have the "dimension" of a postcard). Both cameras used zoom lenses, the photographer took a great care to capture the same area of the particular object (let's suppose it's a portrait) with the same or almost the same settings (ISO value, shutter speed, jpg straight out of camera etc.). Of course, the photographer had to keep in mind the difference between ff and a cropped frame, etc. etc. Now, the point is this: you will not see much (if any) difference in "basic technical quality" (so to speak). However, the pixels will start "rearing their ugly heads" once you enlarge these photos to the certain size(s), but it will be even more obvious once the both are printed using the same printer, same paper/textile. Suffice to say, full frame will have the upper hand. I hope I was clear enough (obviously, English is not my native language... but I adore English:o). [/QUOTE]

Verification