Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D200
D40 vs D200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 208404" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>They all shoot video... Just one of those things.</p><p></p><p>As for the 5100 and 5200... They are a step up from the 3200 in that they have more features and upgraded components. However, if you're not going to be using those features why pay for them? I don't think you would see a difference, in general, in the same shot taken with a 5200 vs a 3200 unless you really want to start picking them apart at the pixel level.</p><p></p><p>Getting your mitts on physical specimens is definitely the way to go. I just caution people not to pay for s--t they're not going to actually use. Be honest about what you need and pay for nothing else. Put any extra cash into a good lens, not bells and whistles that will sit unused. </p><p></p><p>I'd suggest a D3200 and a really nice lens instead of a 5200 unless the 5200 has something that really appeals to you... Pair a D3200 with a Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX VR in place of the 18-55mm kit lens, and you'd be soooooo set my friend.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 208404, member: 13090"] They all shoot video... Just one of those things. As for the 5100 and 5200... They are a step up from the 3200 in that they have more features and upgraded components. However, if you're not going to be using those features why pay for them? I don't think you would see a difference, in general, in the same shot taken with a 5200 vs a 3200 unless you really want to start picking them apart at the pixel level. Getting your mitts on physical specimens is definitely the way to go. I just caution people not to pay for s--t they're not going to actually use. Be honest about what you need and pay for nothing else. Put any extra cash into a good lens, not bells and whistles that will sit unused. I'd suggest a D3200 and a really nice lens instead of a 5200 unless the 5200 has something that really appeals to you... Pair a D3200 with a Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX VR in place of the 18-55mm kit lens, and you'd be soooooo set my friend. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D200
D40 vs D200
Top