Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
D3200 vs. D7000 vs. D300(s)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakehinds" data-source="post: 411103" data-attributes="member: 15865"><p>I feel like this is an appropriate place to post this thread but here it goes:</p><p>I'm looking at the 4 cameras listed above. I have 4 options; buy the D3200 and get more lens for my money, or get one of the other three bodies and get an alright lens.</p><p></p><p>Where I'm coming from: D5100 with 18-55 kit lens, I just sold that tonight, and I have a Nikon 50mm 1.8g arriving tomorrow. I shoot pretty much everything but mainly enjoy foresty/landscapes, sometimes indoor/outdoor sports(I'd enjoy it more just not with an 18-55 3.5-5.6 lens) and travel/walkaround. Weatherproofing on the 300,300s, and d7000 are very attractive...</p><p></p><p>Where I'll start now: I'll have the 50mm prime, and a budget of $615</p><p>Lenses I've been looking at: Nikon 16-85 3.5-5.6, Nikon 18-70 3.5-4.5, and the Sigma 17-50 2.8</p><p>I'm not really looking for a telephoto at this moment as I'd rarely use it compared to a wider angle(DX crop though, so 127mm, 105mm and 75mm respectively) Only con about the sigma is that I already cover the 50mm range, but pro is that its a wider angle at f/2.8 compared to f/3.5.</p><p>I'm leaning slightly towards either the 300 or 300s mounted with the 16-85 or the 17-50...</p><p></p><p>Side note: I'll be buying used<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakehinds, post: 411103, member: 15865"] I feel like this is an appropriate place to post this thread but here it goes: I'm looking at the 4 cameras listed above. I have 4 options; buy the D3200 and get more lens for my money, or get one of the other three bodies and get an alright lens. Where I'm coming from: D5100 with 18-55 kit lens, I just sold that tonight, and I have a Nikon 50mm 1.8g arriving tomorrow. I shoot pretty much everything but mainly enjoy foresty/landscapes, sometimes indoor/outdoor sports(I'd enjoy it more just not with an 18-55 3.5-5.6 lens) and travel/walkaround. Weatherproofing on the 300,300s, and d7000 are very attractive... Where I'll start now: I'll have the 50mm prime, and a budget of $615 Lenses I've been looking at: Nikon 16-85 3.5-5.6, Nikon 18-70 3.5-4.5, and the Sigma 17-50 2.8 I'm not really looking for a telephoto at this moment as I'd rarely use it compared to a wider angle(DX crop though, so 127mm, 105mm and 75mm respectively) Only con about the sigma is that I already cover the 50mm range, but pro is that its a wider angle at f/2.8 compared to f/3.5. I'm leaning slightly towards either the 300 or 300s mounted with the 16-85 or the 17-50... Side note: I'll be buying used:) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
D3200 vs. D7000 vs. D300(s)?
Top
