Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pierro" data-source="post: 69362" data-attributes="member: 8517">I dont know a single photographer who's photos are sharp at 100% uncropped view.&nbsp; So i think you're worrying too much.&nbsp; The photo looks fine for an amateur shot. One thing though, you've used -EV to the point where your shutter speed is down to 1/40th. Unless you have a VR lens, this maybe a tad too slow, so if you need -EV, and i assume you did because of the extreme contrast between land and sky, then up the ISO a stop ( or 2 ) to get some shutter speed back. Also with a static shot like that, you could AF then switch to MF and initiate LV 10x ( if you have that function ) and manually focus in case the lens is not accurate enoughLike Jack i ran it through my Editor&nbsp; ( CS5 )&nbsp; and ignoring my own style of processing, the sharpness seems ok once its reduced to a reasonable size<img src="http://i45.tinypic.com/125kxs6.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pierro, post: 69362, member: 8517"] I dont know a single photographer who's photos are sharp at 100% uncropped view. So i think you're worrying too much. The photo looks fine for an amateur shot. One thing though, you've used -EV to the point where your shutter speed is down to 1/40th. Unless you have a VR lens, this maybe a tad too slow, so if you need -EV, and i assume you did because of the extreme contrast between land and sky, then up the ISO a stop ( or 2 ) to get some shutter speed back. Also with a static shot like that, you could AF then switch to MF and initiate LV 10x ( if you have that function ) and manually focus in case the lens is not accurate enough Like Jack i ran it through my Editor ( CS5 ) and ignoring my own style of processing, the sharpness seems ok once its reduced to a reasonable size [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/125kxs6.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification