Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
D200 vs. D700
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 122401" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>All things being equal, an FX camera will outperform a DX camera in most areas, especially higher ISO performance. The sensor pixel density is not as great for FX as it is for DX. As far as file size, I can't see how a camera with a lower MP rating would have a bigger file size if both are in the same mode, ie, raw vs jpeg and both were taking an image of the exact same thing.</p><p></p><p>The sensor in a D200 is a CCD (Charge Coupled Device) technology which not only eats up battery power quicker, compared with the CMOS (complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor) sensor of the D700 it is not as capable and is prone to vertically smearing high areas. Apart from being cheaper, because of age and capabilities, I cannot think of a single reason why someone would want to get a D200 versus a D700.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 122401, member: 12827"] All things being equal, an FX camera will outperform a DX camera in most areas, especially higher ISO performance. The sensor pixel density is not as great for FX as it is for DX. As far as file size, I can't see how a camera with a lower MP rating would have a bigger file size if both are in the same mode, ie, raw vs jpeg and both were taking an image of the exact same thing. The sensor in a D200 is a CCD (Charge Coupled Device) technology which not only eats up battery power quicker, compared with the CMOS (complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor) sensor of the D700 it is not as capable and is prone to vertically smearing high areas. Apart from being cheaper, because of age and capabilities, I cannot think of a single reason why someone would want to get a D200 versus a D700. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
D200 vs. D700
Top
