Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Crop v Full Frame, my own test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peter7100" data-source="post: 765825" data-attributes="member: 48633"><p>Until a few years ago, all my gear was Canon only and during that long period of time I found FF to be better for landscapes based on the FF bodies and crops I owned at that time. I gradually made the switch to Nikon having tried a couple of bodies/lens from friends who were firmly in the Nikon camp.</p><p>My initial thoughts were along the lines of finding a good crop and then maybe adding a FF at some stage. Before I had the chance to look at a FF purchase I had read an article which suggested the D7100 could match the D600 when it came to Landscape shots. Maybe the missing filter on the D7100 really helps&#55358;&#56596;</p><p>So I decided to see how my very capable Canon FF would stand up to my Nikon crop. Given that the latter performed very well, it has certainly made me think I will not be looking to add a FF to my collection in the near future.</p><p>I suspect there might only be a couple of things that may tempt me in the future and that is the low light performance not being very good on the crop and not so good iso performance.</p><p>I do agree, it was not a very scientific or normal match to compare, but more a case of highlighting that crop bodies can hold their own in Landscape Photography. Often the first thing you hear for people looking to get into this field is, FF is the way to go. Well I beg to differ &#55357;&#56876;</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peter7100, post: 765825, member: 48633"] Until a few years ago, all my gear was Canon only and during that long period of time I found FF to be better for landscapes based on the FF bodies and crops I owned at that time. I gradually made the switch to Nikon having tried a couple of bodies/lens from friends who were firmly in the Nikon camp. My initial thoughts were along the lines of finding a good crop and then maybe adding a FF at some stage. Before I had the chance to look at a FF purchase I had read an article which suggested the D7100 could match the D600 when it came to Landscape shots. Maybe the missing filter on the D7100 really helps�� So I decided to see how my very capable Canon FF would stand up to my Nikon crop. Given that the latter performed very well, it has certainly made me think I will not be looking to add a FF to my collection in the near future. I suspect there might only be a couple of things that may tempt me in the future and that is the low light performance not being very good on the crop and not so good iso performance. I do agree, it was not a very scientific or normal match to compare, but more a case of highlighting that crop bodies can hold their own in Landscape Photography. Often the first thing you hear for people looking to get into this field is, FF is the way to go. Well I beg to differ �� [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Crop v Full Frame, my own test
Top