Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
Critique of first Portrait shots
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Revet" data-source="post: 266651" data-attributes="member: 17612"><p>Thanks fotojack. I think I found one of the problems, self-portraits!!!! I import all my RAW photos into Lightroom and when I looked at these I thought they all were horrible photos of myself (as I think with pretty much every photo of myself); thus I did everything I could in Lightroom to make it look better. Unfortunately in this case, I dropped the exposure a full stop (maybe more). Anyhow, lets work with what you said and I will get one shot I think is good and re-post it to see if I got the lighting better.</p><p></p><p>Most of the stuff I read said to use the umbrella about 30 to 45 degrees off the camera-subject axis and keep it high and close to the subject (about 3 feet when using it as relective). What the heck is 3 feet?? I assume they mean from the apex of the umbrella?? How high?? What Angle?? Yes yes, I am a detail person and want it all to the mm and the degree. Anyhow, I am looking for a good starting point in which I can adjust for the subject as I get better.</p><p> </p><p>You really have me confused on the butterfly technique. I had the flash as high as I could get it with an 8 foot ceiling using an umbrella. It was pretty much right above the camera. I still didn't see much of a shadow below the nose so I don't see how lowering the light would do me any better. BTW, budget is not a problem, I just want to get proficient with the equipment I have before I add things.</p><p></p><p>ps. I won't tell my daughter you thought she was my wife, She would find that really weird!!!! lol</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Revet, post: 266651, member: 17612"] Thanks fotojack. I think I found one of the problems, self-portraits!!!! I import all my RAW photos into Lightroom and when I looked at these I thought they all were horrible photos of myself (as I think with pretty much every photo of myself); thus I did everything I could in Lightroom to make it look better. Unfortunately in this case, I dropped the exposure a full stop (maybe more). Anyhow, lets work with what you said and I will get one shot I think is good and re-post it to see if I got the lighting better. Most of the stuff I read said to use the umbrella about 30 to 45 degrees off the camera-subject axis and keep it high and close to the subject (about 3 feet when using it as relective). What the heck is 3 feet?? I assume they mean from the apex of the umbrella?? How high?? What Angle?? Yes yes, I am a detail person and want it all to the mm and the degree. Anyhow, I am looking for a good starting point in which I can adjust for the subject as I get better. You really have me confused on the butterfly technique. I had the flash as high as I could get it with an 8 foot ceiling using an umbrella. It was pretty much right above the camera. I still didn't see much of a shadow below the nose so I don't see how lowering the light would do me any better. BTW, budget is not a problem, I just want to get proficient with the equipment I have before I add things. ps. I won't tell my daughter you thought she was my wife, She would find that really weird!!!! lol [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
Critique of first Portrait shots
Top