Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Could someone give me samples of 55-200mm & 55-300mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 150259" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>In terms of focal length, your computation is correct. In terms of total area that can be recorded by the camera, it is different. FX is larger on all four sides.</p><p></p><p>If you put a 55-300mm DX lens on a FX lens, it will be able to record or function as a DX camera but you will not get additional 1.5x factor when you use a FX camera since that 55-300mm DX lens is already factored in. So, the 82-450mm computation is wrong and the answer remains 55-300mm when using it with a FX camera.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 150259, member: 6573"] In terms of focal length, your computation is correct. In terms of total area that can be recorded by the camera, it is different. FX is larger on all four sides. If you put a 55-300mm DX lens on a FX lens, it will be able to record or function as a DX camera but you will not get additional 1.5x factor when you use a FX camera since that 55-300mm DX lens is already factored in. So, the 82-450mm computation is wrong and the answer remains 55-300mm when using it with a FX camera. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Could someone give me samples of 55-200mm & 55-300mm?
Top
