Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Continue With Nikon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 201071" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>A <em>pro-level </em>DX? That is a contradiction in terms. I know dozens of professional photographers and not a one of them uses a DX camera. In fact most would probably chuckle at the thought. And several of your requirements for your ideal pro-level camera are unrealistic as well. There are no real small and lightweight pro cameras, by virtue of the levels of construction that are requited to make them "pro-level". The 24x16mm format is too limited to be considered "pro-level" by today's standards. One area, and not the only one, were DX falls flatly on its sword compared to FX is <em>depth of field control</em>. </p><p></p><p>Besides, your profile says your a <em>hobbyist</em>, why would you need a p<em>ro-level c</em>amera if you are only a hobbyist? Isn't that like a casual driver buying an Lamborghini Countach to drive to and from the mall?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 201071, member: 12827"] A [I]pro-level [/I]DX? That is a contradiction in terms. I know dozens of professional photographers and not a one of them uses a DX camera. In fact most would probably chuckle at the thought. And several of your requirements for your ideal pro-level camera are unrealistic as well. There are no real small and lightweight pro cameras, by virtue of the levels of construction that are requited to make them "pro-level". The 24x16mm format is too limited to be considered "pro-level" by today's standards. One area, and not the only one, were DX falls flatly on its sword compared to FX is [I]depth of field control[/I]. Besides, your profile says your a [I]hobbyist[/I], why would you need a p[I]ro-level c[/I]amera if you are only a hobbyist? Isn't that like a casual driver buying an Lamborghini Countach to drive to and from the mall? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Continue With Nikon?
Top
