Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Camera Fun" data-source="post: 558784" data-attributes="member: 13006">So after getting my Tamron 24-70 2.8, I really like having a constant aperture.&nbsp; Therefore I'm considering trading my Tamron 70-300 for either a Tamron 70-200 f2.8 or the Nikon 70-200 f4.0.&nbsp; Basically I'm willing to give up some focal length for the constant aperture.&nbsp; My photos are general (people, scenery, events, etc.).&nbsp; I took some outdoor photos of my daughter and her prom date recently with the 70-300 but felt somewhat limited by the variable aperture when trying some different shots.&nbsp; I like the concept of the 2.8 on the Tamron for darker indoor events but the smaller dimensions of the Nikon are appealing.&nbsp; I'm also keeping in mind that someday I will most likely upgrade from my D7000 to either a D7XXX or something like a D750.&nbsp; What are the pros/cons of the Tamron 70-200 F2.8 vs the Nikon 70-200 F4.0?Thanks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Camera Fun, post: 558784, member: 13006"] So after getting my Tamron 24-70 2.8, I really like having a constant aperture. Therefore I'm considering trading my Tamron 70-300 for either a Tamron 70-200 f2.8 or the Nikon 70-200 f4.0. Basically I'm willing to give up some focal length for the constant aperture. My photos are general (people, scenery, events, etc.). I took some outdoor photos of my daughter and her prom date recently with the 70-300 but felt somewhat limited by the variable aperture when trying some different shots. I like the concept of the 2.8 on the Tamron for darker indoor events but the smaller dimensions of the Nikon are appealing. I'm also keeping in mind that someday I will most likely upgrade from my D7000 to either a D7XXX or something like a D750. What are the pros/cons of the Tamron 70-200 F2.8 vs the Nikon 70-200 F4.0? Thanks. [/QUOTE]

Verification