Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Confused about telephoto choice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gustafson" data-source="post: 620842" data-attributes="member: 40735"><p>I'm having a NAS attack these past few weeks and feel compelled to purchase a long lens, mainly for birding with DX cameras. Short-term plan is backyard birding, but hoping for something I don't have to replace as my hobby grows. My budget is $500, and I'm looking for an option that lends itself to shooting handheld. Would appreciate if fellow Nikonites could weigh in on the options that I'm considering (please steer me away from bad choices!) and rationale (please correct any incorrect assumptions):</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>300 f/4.5 ED-IF AI-s MF</strong> (+modified TC-16A for limited AF): I already have this, but my copy is faulty and doesn't focus at infinity. Peak sharpness is supposedly at f8, which limits utility, esp. with TC added.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>70-300 AF-P f4.5-6.3 DX VR</strong>: Briefly owned this but returned due to AF being a bit off. Better usability than the 300 f/4.5 ED-IF, but not impressed with sharpness beyond 10ft. Slow speed at long end = grainy images.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>300 f/4 AF-D </strong>(screw drive): Hoping this will be sharp enough wide open and work with a 1.4x Kenko pro or TC-16A (or both stacked) for added reach. Will have AF at 300 f/4 and 420 f/5.6, and possibly at 480 f/6.4, 670 f/9</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>300 f/2.8 ED-IF MF </strong>(+modified TC-16A for limited AF): Haven't tried this, but hoping it will be sharper and afford better noise control.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>400 f/5.6 ED-IF MF </strong>(+modified TC-16A for limited AF): Haven't tried this, but the 300 f/4 with 1.4x TCs is generally recommended instead</li> </ul><p></p><p>How would you rank these? Or if you had to pick one, which would it be? Or do you know of a superior option in this price rance? Can't wait to see the responses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gustafson, post: 620842, member: 40735"] I'm having a NAS attack these past few weeks and feel compelled to purchase a long lens, mainly for birding with DX cameras. Short-term plan is backyard birding, but hoping for something I don't have to replace as my hobby grows. My budget is $500, and I'm looking for an option that lends itself to shooting handheld. Would appreciate if fellow Nikonites could weigh in on the options that I'm considering (please steer me away from bad choices!) and rationale (please correct any incorrect assumptions): [LIST] [*][B]300 f/4.5 ED-IF AI-s MF[/B] (+modified TC-16A for limited AF): I already have this, but my copy is faulty and doesn't focus at infinity. Peak sharpness is supposedly at f8, which limits utility, esp. with TC added. [*][B]70-300 AF-P f4.5-6.3 DX VR[/B]: Briefly owned this but returned due to AF being a bit off. Better usability than the 300 f/4.5 ED-IF, but not impressed with sharpness beyond 10ft. Slow speed at long end = grainy images. [*][B]300 f/4 AF-D [/B](screw drive): Hoping this will be sharp enough wide open and work with a 1.4x Kenko pro or TC-16A (or both stacked) for added reach. Will have AF at 300 f/4 and 420 f/5.6, and possibly at 480 f/6.4, 670 f/9 [*][B]300 f/2.8 ED-IF MF [/B](+modified TC-16A for limited AF): Haven't tried this, but hoping it will be sharper and afford better noise control. [*][B]400 f/5.6 ED-IF MF [/B](+modified TC-16A for limited AF): Haven't tried this, but the 300 f/4 with 1.4x TCs is generally recommended instead [/LIST] How would you rank these? Or if you had to pick one, which would it be? Or do you know of a superior option in this price rance? Can't wait to see the responses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Confused about telephoto choice
Top