Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Composition.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 210803" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>Wow! I'm impressed. We are certainly on very different levels in any artistic regard.</p><p></p><p>I am the last one that should give any art opinion, but I suspect Picasso was just having a good laugh at us. We have seen several of the great museums and Vatican in Europe, and mostly, I just don't get all of it, not the appeal today. I can appreciate the development in the older work, perspective and media and even styles in some degree, but mostly I just don't get the great reverence shown for it today. I suspect it is mostly a collector thing. Michelangelo was easier of course, but I saw stuff in Rijksmuseum by (to me) obscure names, about same dates, that I thought stood out way ahead of Rembrandt and such. Obviously not a correct opinion. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> The old B.C. sculptures were fantastic though, that even then they could do this.</p><p></p><p>I am not aware that Rembrandt or Michelangelo cropped their work, so maybe you may have something. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> But to me, cropping is a very strong and major tool. If it needs it, do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 210803, member: 12496"] Wow! I'm impressed. We are certainly on very different levels in any artistic regard. I am the last one that should give any art opinion, but I suspect Picasso was just having a good laugh at us. We have seen several of the great museums and Vatican in Europe, and mostly, I just don't get all of it, not the appeal today. I can appreciate the development in the older work, perspective and media and even styles in some degree, but mostly I just don't get the great reverence shown for it today. I suspect it is mostly a collector thing. Michelangelo was easier of course, but I saw stuff in Rijksmuseum by (to me) obscure names, about same dates, that I thought stood out way ahead of Rembrandt and such. Obviously not a correct opinion. :) The old B.C. sculptures were fantastic though, that even then they could do this. I am not aware that Rembrandt or Michelangelo cropped their work, so maybe you may have something. :) But to me, cropping is a very strong and major tool. If it needs it, do it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Composition.
Top