Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Compare sharpness and IQ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clovishound" data-source="post: 812424" data-attributes="member: 50197"><p>In order to make a fair comparison, I would take at least 4 pictures of the same exact subject, preferably a static one, using a tripod to exclude any camera shake. Two, one at 500mm and maximum aperture and a second stopped down one or two stops. I would then take two more at 600mm, again, one at maximum and another the same 1 or 2 stops down. With different apertures and ISO settings, you don't know what differences are from resolution at a given focal length, and which are from changes in settings. It would also be helpful to do the same with the 200-500mm at 500mm, if available for the test, don't know how many folks would have both to try it.</p><p></p><p>I have no doubt that the new lens will outperform the 200-500, even at 600. While, an excellent lens for the money, the 200-500 barely makes the grade for 36MP, whereas the Z lens are reputed to be optimized for the newer high resolution sensors. It should be noted that not many FX lenses make the grade of 36MP resolution or higher. Link: <a href="https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-resolution" target="_blank">Why Nikon Should Not Make DSLRs Over 36 MP</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clovishound, post: 812424, member: 50197"] In order to make a fair comparison, I would take at least 4 pictures of the same exact subject, preferably a static one, using a tripod to exclude any camera shake. Two, one at 500mm and maximum aperture and a second stopped down one or two stops. I would then take two more at 600mm, again, one at maximum and another the same 1 or 2 stops down. With different apertures and ISO settings, you don't know what differences are from resolution at a given focal length, and which are from changes in settings. It would also be helpful to do the same with the 200-500mm at 500mm, if available for the test, don't know how many folks would have both to try it. I have no doubt that the new lens will outperform the 200-500, even at 600. While, an excellent lens for the money, the 200-500 barely makes the grade for 36MP, whereas the Z lens are reputed to be optimized for the newer high resolution sensors. It should be noted that not many FX lenses make the grade of 36MP resolution or higher. Link: [URL='https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-resolution']Why Nikon Should Not Make DSLRs Over 36 MP[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Compare sharpness and IQ
Top