Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Comments Welcome
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joseph Bautsch" data-source="post: 17160" data-attributes="member: 654"><p>It looks to me like nine shots for an HDR in this case was more than what was needed. In some cases too many shots can do just the reverse of an HDR. There is loss of detail in both the shadows and highlights. On an overcast, gray day there is little contrast for a nine shot HDR to work with. On a day like that a one stop range over three shots or even a 1/3, or 1/2 stop range might have worked much better. HDR is most effective with a wide contrast range, dark shadows and bright highlights. In HDR "more" is not always better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joseph Bautsch, post: 17160, member: 654"] It looks to me like nine shots for an HDR in this case was more than what was needed. In some cases too many shots can do just the reverse of an HDR. There is loss of detail in both the shadows and highlights. On an overcast, gray day there is little contrast for a nine shot HDR to work with. On a day like that a one stop range over three shots or even a 1/3, or 1/2 stop range might have worked much better. HDR is most effective with a wide contrast range, dark shadows and bright highlights. In HDR "more" is not always better. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Comments Welcome
Top