Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LensWork" data-source="post: 7581" data-attributes="member: 1283">I see Anthony's point, but a portion of Ken Rockwell's quote that&nbsp; AfterImage provided that was omitted does validate the use of Adobe 1998&nbsp; for some: &quot;[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]If you're one of the few a&nbsp; full-time career professional photographers left standing and shoot for&nbsp; print, by all means shoot Adobe RGB&quot;. &nbsp; Anthony &amp; Ken both speak of sRGB providing more vibrant colors, but&nbsp; where more realistic, accurate if you will, colors are required, a&nbsp; properly calibrated Adobe 1998 profile from capture through the printing&nbsp; process will yield more accurate colors than sRGB. I found this to be&nbsp; true when shooting product shots for a camera bag manufacturer's print&nbsp; catalog. In this case the bags varying shades: slate blue, navy blue.&nbsp; forest green, olive drab, etc. were rendered more accurately using the&nbsp; Adobe 1998 color space. [/FONT]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LensWork, post: 7581, member: 1283"] I see Anthony's point, but a portion of Ken Rockwell's quote that AfterImage provided that was omitted does validate the use of Adobe 1998 for some: "[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]If you're one of the few a full-time career professional photographers left standing and shoot for print, by all means shoot Adobe RGB". Anthony & Ken both speak of sRGB providing more vibrant colors, but where more realistic, accurate if you will, colors are required, a properly calibrated Adobe 1998 profile from capture through the printing process will yield more accurate colors than sRGB. I found this to be true when shooting product shots for a camera bag manufacturer's print catalog. In this case the bags varying shades: slate blue, navy blue. forest green, olive drab, etc. were rendered more accurately using the Adobe 1998 color space. [/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification