Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WhiteLight" data-source="post: 147544" data-attributes="member: 9556">For what you have done (basic resizing &amp; converting), Capture NX2 will give better results.Firstly cos CNX2 is optimized for NikonSecond you are comparing an older version of LR with the last version of CNX2, so i am assuming you would still be missing on some features.Both are brilliant programs, CNX2 has a steeper learning curve cos Nikon doesn't seem to care all that much about its software so the number of quality tutorials available for CNX2 is very limited.The Control Points perform very well.On the other hand, LR is very well marketed, lots of folks use it &amp; swear by it..At the end of the day, both are quality programs and you won't be disappointed with either.If you ask me, i would say start with LR, but do go ahead and learn CNX2 (and other programs as well)Regarding the pics, i don't really see all that much of a difference. And if you shooting RAW, you got all bases covered</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WhiteLight, post: 147544, member: 9556"] For what you have done (basic resizing & converting), Capture NX2 will give better results. Firstly cos CNX2 is optimized for Nikon Second you are comparing an older version of LR with the last version of CNX2, so i am assuming you would still be missing on some features. Both are brilliant programs, CNX2 has a steeper learning curve cos Nikon doesn't seem to care all that much about its software so the number of quality tutorials available for CNX2 is very limited. The Control Points perform very well. On the other hand, LR is very well marketed, lots of folks use it & swear by it.. At the end of the day, both are quality programs and you won't be disappointed with either. If you ask me, i would say start with LR, but do go ahead and learn CNX2 (and other programs as well) Regarding the pics, i don't really see all that much of a difference. And if you shooting RAW, you got all bases covered [/QUOTE]

Verification