Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 375644" data-attributes="member: 13090">While DxO Mark takes a lot of heat for their findings around here, and some have even alleged under the table dealings and other shady practices (without bothering to back up that mud slinging with anything resembling credible evidence); I've yet to see *any* legitimate source dispute either DxO Mark testing procedures (which they document quite thoroughly online), or their findings, in any way whatsoever. Yes, they are but a single benchmark to be considered but I find them entirely credible.All that being said, I'm pretty shocked at the findings regarding the 7D MkII. On the spec sheets that was looking like a pretty killer setup but wow... Not looking so killer to me any more. The '7100 is spanks it hard, steals its lunch money and keeps saying, &quot;Stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself...&quot;........</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 375644, member: 13090"] While DxO Mark takes a lot of heat for their findings around here, and some have even alleged under the table dealings and other shady practices (without bothering to back up that mud slinging with anything resembling credible evidence); I've yet to see *any* legitimate source dispute either DxO Mark testing procedures (which they document quite thoroughly online), or their findings, in any way whatsoever. Yes, they are but a single benchmark to be considered but I find them entirely credible. All that being said, I'm pretty shocked at the findings regarding the 7D MkII. On the spec sheets that was looking like a pretty killer setup but wow... Not looking so killer to me any more. The '7100 is spanks it hard, steals its lunch money and keeps saying, "Stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself..." [COLOR=#ffffff]....[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification