Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Cameras Are About to Get 1000 Times Better At Taking Low-Light Photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 156552" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>Phase 1 makes one but that is really not the point. And it costs as much as a medium end digital camera. And you still wind up in the same dilemma as you do with DX format and 35mm/FX focal length lenses. The sensor is a good bit smaller than the 6x6 or 6x4.5 cm format. My 40mm Distagon, which is a superb lens from the word go, is equivalent to a 24mm lens in 35mm. With the Phase 1 back it is now equivalent to a 35mm lens, which for me is as useless as tits on a bull. I already have a lens equivalent to that in my 60mm Distagon. The only lens Hasselblad makes which is shorter than the 40mm Distagon (and will work on my 500C/M) is the 30mm Distagon and it is a full frame fisheye.</p><p></p><p>Film, especially medium format film, has a certain quality that digital will most likely never be able to replicate, especially in black and white. And digital cannot be pushed or pulled like film can. And although digital has come a long way, it still falls WAY far short of the mark compared to a black and white print made with a medium format negative printed on a premium paper like Oriental Seagull, which is all I use.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 156552, member: 12827"] Phase 1 makes one but that is really not the point. And it costs as much as a medium end digital camera. And you still wind up in the same dilemma as you do with DX format and 35mm/FX focal length lenses. The sensor is a good bit smaller than the 6x6 or 6x4.5 cm format. My 40mm Distagon, which is a superb lens from the word go, is equivalent to a 24mm lens in 35mm. With the Phase 1 back it is now equivalent to a 35mm lens, which for me is as useless as tits on a bull. I already have a lens equivalent to that in my 60mm Distagon. The only lens Hasselblad makes which is shorter than the 40mm Distagon (and will work on my 500C/M) is the 30mm Distagon and it is a full frame fisheye. Film, especially medium format film, has a certain quality that digital will most likely never be able to replicate, especially in black and white. And digital cannot be pushed or pulled like film can. And although digital has come a long way, it still falls WAY far short of the mark compared to a black and white print made with a medium format negative printed on a premium paper like Oriental Seagull, which is all I use. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Cameras Are About to Get 1000 Times Better At Taking Low-Light Photos
Top