Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Calling all wide anglers :o)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Englischdude" data-source="post: 406014" data-attributes="member: 16372"><p>So, I thank you all for your feedback until now. Story so far.....</p><p></p><p>Nikon.... too expensive</p><p>Sigma.... only the 3.5 version of the 10-20 is suitable for IR, and then with flare. also more than I want to pay</p><p>Tamron.... ok for IR and the price is right</p><p>Samyang.... manual focus but very positive first impression, build quality and image quality.</p><p></p><p>I have the Samyang and the Tamron to test. Here the first comparison pictures of an IR shot under similar conditions from the balcony. The difference in sharpness is immediately obvious. I have used the same post processing presents for both images:</p><p></p><p>First the TAMRON:</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://gallery.nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/6/3/7/2/tam1024_ir1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p>And now the Samyang/Rokinon/Bower/Pro-optik/Vivitar and co.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://gallery.nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/6/3/7/2/sam14mm_ir1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Both display good IR properties, no flare or hotspots, however the sharpness in IR of the Samyang is better across the entire frame.</p><p>More visible spectrum comparison shots to follow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Englischdude, post: 406014, member: 16372"] So, I thank you all for your feedback until now. Story so far..... Nikon.... too expensive Sigma.... only the 3.5 version of the 10-20 is suitable for IR, and then with flare. also more than I want to pay Tamron.... ok for IR and the price is right Samyang.... manual focus but very positive first impression, build quality and image quality. I have the Samyang and the Tamron to test. Here the first comparison pictures of an IR shot under similar conditions from the balcony. The difference in sharpness is immediately obvious. I have used the same post processing presents for both images: First the TAMRON: [IMG]http://gallery.nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/6/3/7/2/tam1024_ir1.jpg[/IMG] And now the Samyang/Rokinon/Bower/Pro-optik/Vivitar and co. [IMG]http://gallery.nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/6/3/7/2/sam14mm_ir1.jpg[/IMG] Both display good IR properties, no flare or hotspots, however the sharpness in IR of the Samyang is better across the entire frame. More visible spectrum comparison shots to follow. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Calling all wide anglers :o)
Top
