Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Calling all wide anglers :o)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Murray" data-source="post: 404251" data-attributes="member: 9753"><p>The reason why I would prefer the 14mm f2.8 over the 16mm f4 is those extra stops, at 2.8 the Rokinon is very sharp and I can get good exposures without increasing my ISO too much which reduces noise. My normal settings for Milky way shots is 14mm, f/2.8, ISO 3200, 20 Sec. If I used the 16mm it would be 16mm, f/4, ISO 5000 (roughly), 20 sec. So as you can see the only thing that really changes is the ISO.</p><p></p><p>It has nothing to do with the focal length in this case as the difference between 14-16mm is not much at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Murray, post: 404251, member: 9753"] The reason why I would prefer the 14mm f2.8 over the 16mm f4 is those extra stops, at 2.8 the Rokinon is very sharp and I can get good exposures without increasing my ISO too much which reduces noise. My normal settings for Milky way shots is 14mm, f/2.8, ISO 3200, 20 Sec. If I used the 16mm it would be 16mm, f/4, ISO 5000 (roughly), 20 sec. So as you can see the only thing that really changes is the ISO. It has nothing to do with the focal length in this case as the difference between 14-16mm is not much at all. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Calling all wide anglers :o)
Top
