Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Englischdude" data-source="post: 404066" data-attributes="member: 16372">go for it, you've got nothing to lose! Be prepared for a steep learning curve though, in many ways this program has been compared to LR!Back to topic, ive not got a reason now not to try the samyang. Findings do far:- only the 3.5 sigma 10-20 is suitable for IR, is however 100 euro more expensive and is not FX compatible- tamron 10-24, all i could find were average reviews at best- samyang 14mm, FX/IR compatible, good quality (although most complain about the focus scale being way off), nikon version is chipped and can be used in Aperture priority mode, camera controls the aperture, leaving only the focusing to be done manually. price performance is good.looks like ill pull the trigger on this one. shame i dont live in the USA, they are 100 euro cheaper over the other side of the pond.i appreciate everyones feedback. Many thanks to you all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Englischdude, post: 404066, member: 16372"] go for it, you've got nothing to lose! Be prepared for a steep learning curve though, in many ways this program has been compared to LR! Back to topic, ive not got a reason now not to try the samyang. Findings do far: - only the 3.5 sigma 10-20 is suitable for IR, is however 100 euro more expensive and is not FX compatible - tamron 10-24, all i could find were average reviews at best - samyang 14mm, FX/IR compatible, good quality (although most complain about the focus scale being way off), nikon version is chipped and can be used in Aperture priority mode, camera controls the aperture, leaving only the focusing to be done manually. price performance is good. looks like ill pull the trigger on this one. shame i dont live in the USA, they are 100 euro cheaper over the other side of the pond. i appreciate everyones feedback. Many thanks to you all. [/QUOTE]

Verification