Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="480sparky" data-source="post: 542029" data-attributes="member: 15805">How about &quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or&nbsp; prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of&nbsp; speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to&nbsp; assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances&quot;?<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#cite_note-1" target="_blank"></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#cite_note-1" target="_blank"></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#cite_note-1" target="_blank"></a>It's called the First Amendment.&nbsp; There has been no Supreme Court ruling about photography being a constitutionally-protected form of free speech.&nbsp; But that's only because every single lower court ruling has affirmed this and SCOTUS has never had it brought before them........... then I'd swap cards, keep on shooting, and recover the images from the card with file recovery software once I got home.Simple tactic to shut the ignorant up and let me be.Heck, even the police have deleted photos and videos from (illegally) confiscated cameras and phones, only to have them recovered for use is a lawsuit against them.What amazes me is people somehow think that if you destroy the evidence that a crime that's been committed, somehow that's OK.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="480sparky, post: 542029, member: 15805"] How about "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"?[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#cite_note-1"] [/URL]It's called the First Amendment. There has been no Supreme Court ruling about photography being a constitutionally-protected form of free speech. But that's only because every single lower court ruling has affirmed this and SCOTUS has never had it brought before them. .......... then I'd swap cards, keep on shooting, and recover the images from the card with file recovery software once I got home. Simple tactic to shut the ignorant up and let me be. Heck, even the police have deleted photos and videos from (illegally) confiscated cameras and phones, only to have them recovered for use is a lawsuit against them. What amazes me is people somehow think that if you[I] destroy the evidence[/I] that a crime that's been committed, somehow that's OK. [/QUOTE]

Verification