Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Buy a D7100 or go Full Frame?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jwstl" data-source="post: 167483" data-attributes="member: 12977"><p>Both the lenses you have are considered FX lenses. The only issue is the corner sharpness of the 70-200 on FX bodies due to vignetting. The 24-70 is a wonderful FX lens and so is the 70-200 as long as you don't mind those corner issues. Nikon updated the 70-200 with VRII and also addressed the vignetting which makes the VRII better on FX. Like I said, if corners are important, considering your 70-200 a DX lens though it really isn't.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jwstl, post: 167483, member: 12977"] Both the lenses you have are considered FX lenses. The only issue is the corner sharpness of the 70-200 on FX bodies due to vignetting. The 24-70 is a wonderful FX lens and so is the 70-200 as long as you don't mind those corner issues. Nikon updated the 70-200 with VRII and also addressed the vignetting which makes the VRII better on FX. Like I said, if corners are important, considering your 70-200 a DX lens though it really isn't. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Buy a D7100 or go Full Frame?
Top
