Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 738369" data-attributes="member: 13556">When I look at a lens, I purchase the latest and fastest focusing lens with the largest aperture that I can afford.&nbsp; If a lens is two or more generations old, I'll find another, or save my money until I can get the better one..&nbsp; For instance, but not to knock what you already have, the 80-200 2.8 that you have, and I am assuming that it is a Nikon lens, will likely limit your photography performance at some point.&nbsp; I had that lens, and thought it was good, until I got to use the AF-S G 70-200 VRI.&nbsp; I do believe that your D7200 is far better than the 80-200, and absolutely know that the D750 is better than that lens.The most important issue, though, is not what we think you shoud purchase next, but what do you need or want the lens for?&nbsp; Match your purchases to that list, and having a stable of prime lenses is never a bad thing, IMHO.WM</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 738369, member: 13556"] When I look at a lens, I purchase the latest and fastest focusing lens with the largest aperture that I can afford. If a lens is two or more generations old, I'll find another, or save my money until I can get the better one.. For instance, but not to knock what you already have, the 80-200 2.8 that you have, and I am assuming that it is a Nikon lens, will likely limit your photography performance at some point. I had that lens, and thought it was good, until I got to use the AF-S G 70-200 VRI. I do believe that your D7200 is far better than the 80-200, and absolutely know that the D750 is better than that lens. The most important issue, though, is not what we think you shoud purchase next, but what do you need or want the lens for? Match your purchases to that list, and having a stable of prime lenses is never a bad thing, IMHO. WM [/QUOTE]

Verification