Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Blown out reds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 297253" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>I have to say that I realize now that you're correct, and I do agree with you. I am slow sometimes. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p> I do have a calibrated monitor screen, with Spyder software that adjusts the video system and screen that I see for what it measures to be corrected response of the video system. I never really thought about it, but maybe my screen is different than the original. I did do a screen capture to acquire your image.</p><p></p><p>Here is the histogram PhotoME plots on your forum image file.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.scantips.com/g2/682.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Small, but it does show less clipping. Clearly I should have done a Save Image As, to retrieve your original image file. I did not, and it was my mistake, sorry.</p><p>I won't do that again. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>But which really seems to be about degree of a different point, since your own complaint was that the red was clipped. Esp the other one.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, we know this happens, and the three RGB histograms in the camera will show this at the time when it could be corrected. </p><p>And the ALT key thing is a good tool in Levels or Raw Exposure, to know we are setting exposure in a harmless way, at least to know what we are clipping.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 297253, member: 12496"] I have to say that I realize now that you're correct, and I do agree with you. I am slow sometimes. :) I do have a calibrated monitor screen, with Spyder software that adjusts the video system and screen that I see for what it measures to be corrected response of the video system. I never really thought about it, but maybe my screen is different than the original. I did do a screen capture to acquire your image. Here is the histogram PhotoME plots on your forum image file. [IMG]http://www.scantips.com/g2/682.jpg[/IMG] Small, but it does show less clipping. Clearly I should have done a Save Image As, to retrieve your original image file. I did not, and it was my mistake, sorry. I won't do that again. :) But which really seems to be about degree of a different point, since your own complaint was that the red was clipped. Esp the other one. Anyway, we know this happens, and the three RGB histograms in the camera will show this at the time when it could be corrected. And the ALT key thing is a good tool in Levels or Raw Exposure, to know we are setting exposure in a harmless way, at least to know what we are clipping. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Blown out reds?
Top