Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 297239" data-attributes="member: 12496">Mine is your image 0682 captured from your posting.&nbsp; Is your try that same JPG image copy which you posted?&nbsp;&nbsp; In my image, see the histogram spike at 255 (above the mouse pointer).&nbsp; The red channel is definitely very clipped (and this was the mildly clipped one).&nbsp;&nbsp; I am using Photoshop CS6.And my point was, this is really expected.&nbsp; We just know that when we walk up to the red flowers.Clipping cannot be fixed. The clipped data is gone, period.&nbsp; Meaning, it is overexposed, and limited at 255.&nbsp; &nbsp; You might want the rest brighter, which is then a dynamic range issue, but this image is overexposed.&nbsp; Again, clipping can be called arbitrary, if that is how you want your image to look.But the solution is to watch the RGB histogram in the camera while in the field (esp in these expected cases when we know this is going to happen), and fix it there, at the time.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 297239, member: 12496"] Mine is your image 0682 captured from your posting. Is your try that same JPG image copy which you posted? In my image, see the histogram spike at 255 (above the mouse pointer). The red channel is definitely very clipped (and this was the mildly clipped one). I am using Photoshop CS6. And my point was, this is really expected. We just know that when we walk up to the red flowers. Clipping cannot be fixed. The clipped data is gone, period. Meaning, it is overexposed, and limited at 255. You might want the rest brighter, which is then a dynamic range issue, but this image is overexposed. Again, clipping can be called arbitrary, if that is how you want your image to look. But the solution is to watch the RGB histogram in the camera while in the field (esp in these expected cases when we know this is going to happen), and fix it there, at the time. [/QUOTE]

Verification